Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Shahid: Martyr for justice

The term Shahid in Urdu/Hindi means martyr. The name of the protagonist in this film is Shahid. It serves both metaphorical and actual purposes, for the protagonist indeed becomes a martyr at the end of the film.







 Director: Hansal Mehta
Film Clip
The film is a real life account of Shahid Azmi who became a lawyer and fought many cases of those who were languishing in jails being wrongly implicated. However, it is this very mission of his that alienates him from his close ones, and finally brings his end.
The film is a realistic depiction of the current Indian criminal proceedings and shows, without resorting to melodrama, how at times the present system can make criminal out of innocents. The personal experience that the protagonist goes through in his own life drives him to take causes of innocent victims who for no fault of theirs fell on the wrong side of the law.
Rajkumar as Shahid has added life to the real life character. No wonder he won the national award for best actor. Even as the film deals with the Indian archaic legal system, it raises questions if our system is all that bad or if there is the dearth of real commitment on the part of lawyers to fight for justice. The film stands out as an off-beat film in the ocean of Bollywood’s masala films.
- Melwyn Pinto SJ

Sunday, April 13, 2014

Fandry: Chasing elusive birds!

Marathi film Fandry which has won many awards, is a typical film that deals with the caste question and the struggle for survival of dalits in an Indian village. This is perhaps one of those very few films that have brought out the raw reality of the subaltern powerfully. The subaltern narrative that is in focus in this film is the brutality of caste system which in this modern world plays out more subtly than the historic untouchability. Here is a family, the day-to-day struggles of which are a spectacle of entertainment for the so called upper caste people in the village. The entire narrative is depicted through the eyes of the teenage son in the family Jabya. The irony is that this boy is chasing two ‘birds’ both of which are elusive to him – one a long-tailed sparrow and the other a fair girl from the upper caste.  









Director: Nagraj Manjule

Film Clip
The caste dynamics at play in this film are similar to the dynamics playing in any village today. Caste today is not just about untouchability; for untouchability in its true sense is no more a major concern, when you can easily stay away with people whom you don’t like. It is about attitudes and perceptions. In the film, the family of Kachrya, the father of Jabya the ‘lover boy’, lives as usual on the fringe of the village; but the family is sought after to tidy the dirt of the village, i.e. to catch the pigs which are another symbol of defilement. Perhaps, the family can be banished only when all the dirt (pigs) are done away from the village. 
The final scene in the film where the young Jabya gives vent to his suppressed anger seems just an aberration in a scenario where dalits are considered a mass to be merely used and suppressed, and the discrimination and humiliation meted out to them considered something normal. It is a landmark film that brings to forth the dalit angst. 
-Melwyn Pinto SJ

Thursday, April 03, 2014

Shattered Glass: Made-up facts!

Truth is sacrosanct in journalism. It is the thread that holds the very fabric of the journalistic world together. But what happens when the facts of a published story, the revered 5 Ws (who, what, when, where, why) and 1 H (how), are just fictional? The whole journalistic medium comes apart at the seams.







Director: Billy Ray

Film Clip

Shattered Glass is a film that captures the unravelling of this scenario by detailing the life of a reporter who concocts tall tales in the guise of truth. Based on the real life of the infamous print journalist Stephen Glass, the movie is a lesson in media ethics and a cautionary story for media professionals. 
Directed by Billy Ray, the movie plays out like a suspenseful thriller. The movie is set in the late 90s, at a time when Stephen Glass, played by Hayden Christensen, was at the height of his career. This young, ambitious and affable reporter was a rising star at The New Republic, a magazine known for its strong political analysis and commentary. The movie depicts how Glass circumvented the editorial process of fact-checking and source verification. The editor at the magazine, played by Peter Sarsgaard exposes Glass’ tenuous web of lies. We watch as Glass’ meteoric rise to fame comes crashing down in a devastating fall from grace.
The story of Stephen Glass is not an isolated one. In 2003, Jayson Blair from the New York Times was also convicted in a similar scandal for manufacturing stories. Renowned Indian journalists have also been accused of breeching journalistic ethics. Numerous reporters have been accused of plagiarism, having a close mutually-beneficial nexus to politicians and corporates, and partaking in paid news.
Journalists have a responsibility to uphold the integrity of their position as the fourth estate. But the abuse of this power, as evidenced in the film, has catastrophic consequences.
- Parinitha Shinde